Orthogonality and Projections
Orthogonality
Definition 95: Orthogonality of Two Vectors
Let be an inner product space over . Two vectors are orthogonal iff:
in which case we say that is orthogonal to , denoted .
Notation
If is not orthogonal to , we write
.
Example.
Let be an inner product space with dot product as the inner product. Then the vectors and are orthogonal because:
Property: Orthogonality is Symmetric
Let be an inner product space. Then for all vectors , if and only if .
Theorem 77: Pythagorean Theorem
Let be an inner product space. Then for all vectors , if , then:
In terms of the induced norm , this can be expressed as:
Proof: Pythagorean Theorem.
Suppose is an inner product space over , and let such that . Then:
Definition 96: Orthogonal Set of Vectors
Let be an inner product space over . A set of vectors is orthogonal iff every pair of distinct vectors in is orthogonal, i.e., for all , if , then :
Theorem 78: Orthogonal Vectors are Linearly Independent
Let be an inner product space over . Then any set of nonzero orthogonal vectors in is linearly independent.
Definition 97: Orthonormal Set of Vectors
Let be an inner product space over . A set of vectors is orthonormal iff is orthogonal and every vector in has norm , or equivalently:
Orthogonal Complements
Definition 98: Orthogonal Complement
Let be an inner product space, and let be a subspace of . The orthogonal complement of in the ambient space , denoted , is the set of vectors in that are orthogonal to every vector in :
Notation: Orthogonality of Vectors to Subspaces
Let be an inner product space, and let be a subspace of . A vector is orthogonal to , denoted , iff for all .
The above notation allows us to express Definition 98 more succinctly as:
Notation: Orthogonality of Subspaces to Subspaces
Let be an inner product space, and let be subspaces of . We say that is orthogonal to , denoted , iff every vector in is orthogonal to every vector in :
Proposition 23: Orthogonal Complements are Subspaces
Let be an inner product space and be a subspace of . Then is a subspace of .
Proof: Orthogonal Complements are Subspaces.
Suppose is an inner product space over , and let be a subspace of .
Let and . Then for all :
Thus, , which implies that . Therefore, is closed under linear combinations, so by Theorem 11, is a subspace of . ∎
Theorem 79: Orthogonal Complements are Complements
Let be a finite-dimensional inner product space, and let be a subspace of . Then:
Corollary 41
By Corollary 10, .
This can be arranged to give a formula for the dimension of the orthogonal complement:
Corollary 42: Dimension of Orthogonal Complements
Let be a finite-dimensional inner product space, and let be a subspace of . Then:
Theorem 80: Involutivity of Orthogonal Complements
Let be a finite-dimensional subspace of an inner product space . Then:
Theorem 81: Characterizing Orthogonal Complements using Spanning Sets
Let be an inner product space, and let be a subspace of . Suppose is a spanning set for . Then for all is a sufficient condition for .
Orthogonal Projections
Definition 99: Orthogonal Projection
Let be an inner product space, and let be a subspace of . The orthogonal projection of a vector onto the subspace , denoted or , is the unique vector in such that:
Exercises
Exercise 78.
Exercise 79.
Exercise 80.
Exercise 81.
Let be subspaces of an inner product space . Show that
Exercise 82.
Let be subspaces of an inner product space . Show that:
Exercise 83.
Let be subspaces of an inner product space . Show that:
Exercise 84.
Exercise 85: Converse of the Pythagorean Theorem.
Let be an inner product space, and let some satisfy:
Show that if is a vector space over , then , but that this is not necessarily true if is a vector space over .
Exercise 86: Parallelogram Law.
Let be an inner product space, and let . Show that:
Exercise 87.
Let be an inner product space, and let . Show that: